While slowly turning into a parking space at approximately 1 mph (?) the vehicle unexpectedly accelerated. The vehicle mounted the curb, and struck a a parked car and hit a brick retaining wall, causing damage to both. This all happened within a few seconds and there were no warning lights or messages before or during the accident. I was not injured and there were no other people present. The police were called and inspected the damages. The insurance company was contacted due to damages. No one was in the parking lot at the time. The manufacturer was notified and will inspect the car for cause/failure.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11721442 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

On or about August 6, 2026, I received email communication from the GM EV Concierge , establishing Case #106606137. My vehicle has been "bricked" and GM has had possession of it since August 3, 2026, (46 days and counting) without so much as an official diagnosis or repair timeline. I have repeatedly been told that the matter has been “escalated,” that GM is “working with the dealership,” and that the repair is being “expedited,” however, I don't know to whom it has been escalated, but at this point I have not received any measurable result rather than continuous general status statements. Regardless, the practical result remains undisputed: my vehicle continues to be unavailable, my vehicle has yet to receive an official diagnosis, and I have yet been provided with a reliable repair timeline. GM continues to route my vehicle through a process that has failed to produce an official diagnosis does not resolve the underlying problem. More importantly, it does nothing to address the fact that I remain without the leased vehicle I am paying for while it is under warranty. Because GM continues to possess my vehicle, I have been required to incur over $3,000.00 in transportation and other expenses that I would not otherwise have incurred, not including the sheer amount of time my wife and I have wasted! I specifically request that GM address its own published Trip Interruption Benefits and Assistance provision. GM’s warranty and roadside-assistance states: “Trip Interruption Benefits and Service: If your trip is interrupted due to a warranty failure, incidental expenses may be reimbursed during the Powertrain warranty period. Items considered are hotel, meals, rental car, or a vehicle being delivered back to the customer, up to 500 miles.” I did not ask GM to make an unsupported goodwill payment. I asked GM to determine whether the circumstances I have experienced qualify for consideration under GM’s own published Trip Interruption Benefits and Assistance provision.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11764970 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

In the past 18 months the vehicle has experienced phantom breaking while driving 3 times. Each time there were no vehicles within 30 or more feet from the vehicle. All 3 times occurred while driving the vehicle and going between 20-40 mph. The vehicle engaged in an emergency break and stopped the car in the road. All three times could have resulted in a major accident as it occurred on busy roadways. This last time it happened in the middle of an intersection with no vehicles around me or behind me. This is a major safety concern and put my family and I in a potentially dangerous situation that could have caused major injuries to myself, my family and others around us. The vehicle is currently with Cadillac being inspected. During conversations with Cadillac they said this is a known issue and suggested that I turn the mechanism off and bypass the safety feature to avoid it from happening again. This is not a systematic fix. This is a bypass. We purchased the car for the safety and security and how sophisticated the safety mechanisms are and we have now been told as a suggestion to simply bypass it. This is very concerning on a national level of That the vehicle is known for doing this. We no longer feel safe in this vehicle The dealer has not confirmed if they have gotten it to duplicate. The only updates we have is that they are still working on the diagnostic testing. There were no warnings prior to the phantom breaking taking place.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11749877 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

Component Involved: Steering Wheel Assembly (Super Cruise Steering Wheel Light Bar / Rim)Safety Defect Description:The plastic insert covering the Super Cruise LED light bar and the surrounding leather wrap located directly on the top rim of the steering wheel are breaking apart, peeling, and separating. This is an immediate and severe driving safety hazard. While executing turns and maneuvering the vehicle, the driver’s hands and clothing sleeves are actively getting caught and snagged on the exposed, broken plastic edges and peeling wrap on the wheel rim. This causes physical interference and sudden, unexpected entrapment of the driver's hand or clothing during active steering.Consequences of the Defect:This defect presents an imminent risk of a vehicle crash due to sudden mechanical restriction of the driver's hands. If a driver’s sleeve or fingers become trapped or snagged by the peeling steering wheel trim while negotiating a sharp turn, curve, or emergency evasive maneuver, they will be unable to smoothly rotate the wheel, leading to a direct loss of steering control.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11746363 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

on Sept 23, 2025, I was rear ended by a driver going between 50-60 mph. I am concerned that some safety features were potentially not working at the time of the incident. I will detail the information below: Background / Original Service Issue: When I initially brought my vehicle to Titus-Will Chevrolet GMC Cadillac for service, I observed that multiple critical safety systems were nonfunctional, including, but not limited to: Forward collision alert sensor All cameras (rear, front, top down) Blind zone steering assist Lane departure warning and other associated warning sensors The dealership kept my car for two days and then informed me that a "module" needed to be ordered for repair, but stated that the vehicle was considered “drivable” and would call me when the part came in. I noticed some of the safety features had resumed working, however some were still non-functional. At no point was I told there were any potential safety risks, nor which safety systems were still not functional. I was not given any paperwork, as they were holding it until the module came in. Crash Event: On 09/23/2025 at 5:37 pm, I was involved in a crash. At the time of impact: The forward collision alert sensor did not function I received no warning of the impending collision No airbags deployed. This may have been directly related to the previously identified and unrepaired safety system issues.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11689541 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

I put the car in reverse and released the parking brake. The car started to move backwards. However, the back passenger door was wide open, and the passenger was standing outside the car in the path of the open door. The door hit a guide wire running from the top of a power pole to the sidewalk beside the car. The wire pulled the door backwards, destroying it. This was fortunate. Without the wire in the way, I would’ve had not heard the crashing of the door and would have continued to drive over the person standing beside the car as the passenger door knocked him down. The indicator that the door was still open is so small on the gauge cluster that I couldn’t see that the door was still open when I put the car into reverse. There was no audible warning that I was about to move before all doors were closed, and the emergency braking didn’t stop the car from moving. The passenger’s leg got pushed sideways under the open door. Had the guidewire not pulled the door backwards and caused so much noise that I stopped, the door would’ve broken the passenger’s leg and potentially pushed him under the rear passenger side tire.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11739744 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing, the rear-view safety sensor alert did not function as intended. In addition, the contact stated that the auto-braking safety sensor did not activate. The contact's vehicle crashed into a tree. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was filed. The contact stated that the case was denied. In addition, contact was denied to receive any documents providing the decision of the case. The failure mileage was approximately 18,125.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11722944 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov