Car Defect Radar
Built from NHTSA complaints and recalls collected for this model, generated September 22, 2026. Totals reflect what has been collected, not every complaint ever filed.

Recalls

0 total

Safety issues the manufacturer must repair for free. A recall means confirm the fix was done, not walk away.

No recalls on record for this model

No safety recalls were found in this dataset. It is still worth entering the exact VIN on NHTSA before purchase, since recalls can be added at any time.

Owner complaints by system

33 total

Unverified reports owners filed with NHTSA, grouped by the part of the car. Useful for spotting patterns. Open a group to read recent examples.

Engine & powertrain

Worth reading
5

Most reports here involve unintended acceleration. Of these, 1 mention a crash.

unintended acceleration 2transmission slipping 2sudden stalling 1
A recent report: Driver of the vehicle was parking the vehicle in a parking lot, foot nowhere near the accelerator when the car suddenly surged forward striking a parking pole.. The driver side front quarter panel…
Read full complaint

Driver of the vehicle was parking the vehicle in a parking lot, foot nowhere near the accelerator when the car suddenly surged forward striking a parking pole.. The driver side front quarter panel took on heavy damage along with the sensors.. Car had to be towed... It accelerated by itself...

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11750004 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

Electrical & infotainment

Worth reading
7

Most reports here involve software faults.

software faults 4loss of steering 1fire 1
A recent report: I'm curious how many other Mazda owners are dealing with the same battery drain issue. I'm now on my third battery since 2024: Factory battery replaced under warranty in 2025. Second replacement…
Read full complaint

I'm curious how many other Mazda owners are dealing with the same battery drain issue. I'm now on my third battery since 2024: Factory battery replaced under warranty in 2025. Second replacement purchased in March 2026. Within a month, the "Battery Low - Drive Vehicle to Recharge" warning was back. The dealer kept my vehicle for four days to monitor it, but they couldn't find anything abnormal. This started long before I had a dashcam professionally installed, so that's not the cause. I've read numerous posts on Facebook from other owners mentioning: A door module that can get wet after heavy rain and cause a parasitic battery drain. The key fob constantly communicating with the vehicle when it's within about 20 feet, potentially contributing to battery drain. I mentioned the door module issue to my dealer, but they said they had never heard of it. At this point, it's becoming incredibly frustrating. A modern vehicle shouldn't be going through batteries like this, especially when the dealer can't identify the root cause. I started to document the times that my dashboard warning pops up that the battery is low.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11750756 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

Brakes

Worth reading
5

Most reports here involve software faults. Of these, 2 mention a crash, 4 mention an injury.

software faults 2loss of braking 1unintended acceleration 1
A recent report: The contact owned a 2024 Mazda CX-50. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, after exiting the freeway, the contact was distracted, and when the contact turned to face the…
Read full complaint

The contact owned a 2024 Mazda CX-50. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, after exiting the freeway, the contact was distracted, and when the contact turned to face the road, the vehicle rear-ended the vehicle in front. The contact stated that from the impact, the vehicle that was rear-ended was pushed into the vehicle in front. The contact stated that the crash imminent braking and the forward collision warning failed to function as intended. The contact stated that the driver-side air bag and the knee air bag were deployed. The contact was unsure whether there was a warning light illuminated. A police report was filed. EMS was called to the scene. However, the contact refused to go to the hospital by ambulance. Afterwards, the contact went to the hospital. The doctor diagnosed that the contact had a swollen spleen on the left side. The contact stated that the shoulders and back were sore, and the left knee was swollen. The contact attended physical therapy. The contact was able to drive the vehicle back to the residence. The insurance company towed the vehicle to an unknown location and deemed the vehicle a total loss. The manufacturer was notified of the failure, and a case was opened where assistance was declined. The failure mileage was 16,937.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11718619 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

Steering, suspension & tires

Minor
4

Most reports here involve loss of steering.

loss of steering 3
A recent report: Component Failed & Availability: Goodyear tire structure/tread separation and delamination across all four tires; technician states delamination, belt separation on all four tires, structural…
Read full complaint

Component Failed & Availability: Goodyear tire structure/tread separation and delamination across all four tires; technician states delamination, belt separation on all four tires, structural failure, tire separating from the internal belt structure (steel belts showing, chunks of tread missing); available for inspection. Safety Risk: Severe risk of sudden blowout, loss of vehicle control, and highway accident due to structural failure and internal belt separation. Dealer/Center Confirmation: Confirmed as a manufacturer defect by American Tire Company during a routine maintenance rotation on July 3, 2026 (fully documented by their shop). Inspections: Inspected and documented by American Tire Company; Goodyear management reviewed the documentation and refused full replacement under the guise of wear and mileage. Warning Lamps / Symptoms: No warning lamps; structural delamination and internal belt separation discovered during routine maintenance. Detailed Summary Description: On July 3, 2026, a routine maintenance rotation at American Tire Company revealed a dangerous structural failure across all four Goodyear tires. The technician states delamination, belt separation on all four tires, structural failure, tire separating from the internal belt structure, with chunks of tread missing and steel belts exposed. When the defect was submitted to Goodyear, July 6, 2026) they refused full warranty replacement, demanding $48.57 per tire under the guise of "wear and mileage." When escalation was requested, company supervisor representative stated there was no higher authority than the supervisor and admitted that internal complaints are dead-ended in their files and never forwarded or reviewed. This stonewalling on a dangerous manufacturing defect poses a severe public safety risk.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11763531 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

Structure & body

Worth reading
9

Most reports here involve fluid leaks. Of these, 2 mention an injury.

fluid leaks 3software faults 1
A recent report: I was attempting to mount my bike rack. To get the clips to properly fit I needed to partially open the liftgate. Upon triggering the door release the power liftgate and began opening the door. The…
Read full complaint

I was attempting to mount my bike rack. To get the clips to properly fit I needed to partially open the liftgate. Upon triggering the door release the power liftgate and began opening the door. The anti pinch system did not detect the pinch and it crumpled the roof and liftgate at the seam. I tried to stop it but there was too much pressure and by the time it stopped lifting under my body weight significant damage had occurred. If a finger had been there it would have been chopped off.

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11733496 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

Other systems

Minor
3

Most reports here involve software faults.

software faults 1fluid leaks 1electrical shorts 1
A recent report: This is the 2nd time I’m reporting that I was severely burnt on my thigh from my drivers seat heater, overheating. There are on going glass action law suits against Mazda for this issue. My 2024…
Read full complaint

This is the 2nd time I’m reporting that I was severely burnt on my thigh from my drivers seat heater, overheating. There are on going glass action law suits against Mazda for this issue. My 2024 CX-50 has not been in service at Olympia Mazda with no updates on repairs and when I will get my car back. Please help me!

Source: NHTSA complaint ODI #11751806 · view all complaints for this vehicle at nhtsa.gov

Is 33 complaints a lot? They were filed between 2024 and 2026, roughly 14 a year, which is more than the typical model in this dataset. We do not have sales figures for this model, so treat this as a rough volume, not a rate per car on the road. Popular, high-volume models naturally collect more complaints over time.